In July, Sony filed a lawsuit against Tencent Motiram litheThe upcoming action game with an open world, which the producer PlayStation called “ripping” by its own post-apocalyptic franchise. Tencent quickly moved to the change Motiram lithePublic marketing materials so that assets cannot be compared so easily Horizon Zero DawnBut now Chinese mega-corp has submitted a request to dismiss the trial as a whole.
Tencent calls the “surprising” lawsuit, saying that Sony is too defensive in terms of game functions that are common in popular video games.
Here is the Tencent shot from the last court application:
Suing an unsweetened project, which only employs the same clues temporarily adopted by dozens of other games released both before and after the horizon-like enslavement, the legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild, Far Cry: Primal, Far, Farre, Outer Wilds, Biomutant and many other-the other of the Impermisan monopolis.
TENCENT claims that Sony’s claims are speculative, based on what it assumes Motiram lithe It will be like. If it is included MotiramThe release date is in two years, the end product can be completely different from what Sony claims.
Funny, Tencent also says that Sony vaguely blames “Tencent” for violating his IP address, a classification that technically includes five different entities. In China there is a holding company and, for example, two different LLC based on Palo Alto. Tencent, essentially, says that Sony does not even know who violates the violation, although it is worth noting that sometimes confusing branches of the company are sometimes taking into account situations like this. If the smaller LLC ever has legal problems, the main existence does not have to suffer consequences, theoretically speaking. In this way, Tencent claims that the fact that Sony was broken up Horizon Zero Dawn Spinoff by Tencent does not necessarily reflect something vile. People creating Motiram lithe They may not be the same people who wanted to do Horizon The game, except that Tencent also does not explain who has done what. He only notices that Sony thinks he was at a meeting with the Directors of Tencent, but there is no Tencent Farm The managers were present.
The movement is really full of such technical. For example, Tencent says that even if the Holdings management was present, it was not proposed Motiram lithe In particular, but rather mobile video game.
“In any case, Tencent Holdings is not a developer or publisher Motiram light“Reads the application.” This Holdings submitted for registration Motiram light The trademark does not suggest otherwise … The vast majority of foreign trademarks in the TENCENT portfolio are recorded by Tencent Holdings for the purposes of managing trademarks, and not because Tencent Holdings is a unit that will develop, publish, create marketing materials for game or beta testing. “
Tencent says that Sony wants to justify that Aloya’s trademark as a character is violated, but the argument is lean if you take into account that Aloy’s appearance may vary depending on what the player equips. Strangely, Tencent also claims that Sony cannot say that Aloy is a “brand identifying the source” for a franchise, which means that Aloy functions as a stenography for the series as a whole. To prove this, Tencent contains a screenshot in which Aloy looks at a distance towards the dinosaur; Because Aloy is not the subject of this particular screenshot, Sony cannot say that Aloy is part of the “Cardinal” brand.
In a sense, what Tencent says is supported by the examples given in the application. Original reviews Horizon Zero Dawn Sometimes he says that the game, although solid, is also a derivative. Some elements present in Motiram lithe have less in common Horizon Zero Dawn Than they do what is popular in AAA video games, in this way you get a game game with craft elements and building a base. But the exemption also changes absurdity when he tries to argue that Aloy really is not so vital for Horizon Zero Dawn mark. All we can do is wait and see what the courts decide.
