AND Chinese technology reviewer Set nvidia nvidia “For China” RTX 5090D against various processors, from the flagship Ryzen 7 9800x3d, to one of the best gaming processors, to the basic Ultra 9 2885K Intel, and up to nine years. Old 14-Core Xeon E5-2680 V4 based on Broadwell architecture. Despite the age, 7 USD was at least moderately competitive with current processors when using DLSS frames, especially with DLSS4 MFG.
Tested reviewer Counter-stand 2IN Marvel’s rivalsAND Cyberpunk 2077 On the assortment of processors paved with RTX 5090D. The list of processors consists of Core Ultra 9 285K, Core Ultra 7 265K, Core Ultra 5 245K, Core i7-14700KF, Core i5-14600KF, Core i5-12400f, Core i3-12100f and Xeon E5-2680 V4. On AMD, Ryzen 9 9900X, Ryzen 7 9800x3D, Ryzen 5 9600X, Ryzen 9 7900X, Ryzen 7 7800x3D, Ryzen 5 7500F and Ryzen 5 5600. This is a wide range of processors that reach almost a decade.
Counter-stand 2 He presented the lowest results for the XEON E5-2680 V4. With maximum 4K settings, the average number of frames per second of the processor was 33% slower than the nearest core I3-12100f, not to mention higher performance, such as Ryzen 7 9800x3D, which were almost twice as faster. The chip based on Broadwell provided an average number of frames per second 168 FPS, with the I3-12100F core at 248 FPS. The fastest processors supplemented to 322 FPS – all without generating frames. 1% low frames were even worse, with the Xeon E5-2680 V4 mesh only 72 FPS, with the fastest processor landing at 163 FPS-2,26x faster.
A terrible number of frames per second xeon in Cs2 It shows a problem with combining such a powerful graphic processor with a “archaic” processor. But RTX 50990D tests also serve as the basis of other tests.
Marvel’s rivals With the highest quality settings with the highest quality 4K, it almost completely reverses Cs2 results. All processors, from the I3-12100F core to the Ultra 9 285K core, were shared virtually identical clamping indicators 111-115 FPS, revealing a bottleneck that is not associated with the processor. Xeon E5-2680 V4 was not far, with the average number of frames per second 101. But again the minimum FPS is crucial, and Xeon managed only 65 FPS compared to 80–99 FPS on other processors. It is up to 34% slower on minimal frames.
Picture 1 With 5
Interestingly, the generation of DLSS 3 frames has doubled the performance of all processors, with most systems at 238–242 FPS. (We must assume that increasing DLSS growth was also enabled, because otherwise the performance should not be at best more than 80 ~ 90 percent faster than Framegen.) With DLSS3 Framegen, Xeon E5-2680 V4 slightly closed the gap slightly, on average 218 fps . However, the minimum were up to 38% slower.
I DLSS4 with MFG4X in Marvel’s rivals pushed on average everything in the range of over 400 FPS. This time Xeon was only 6% behind the fastest tokens. And of course 1% of the minima were still slightly worse, at 164 FPS compared to 298–308 FPS on the fastest processors. So this is a vast 40–47 percent deficit, and as we pointed out in our DLSS4 and MFG tests, when you divide by four to get the basic surface and input speed, it only worked at 41 FPS before Framegen.
Cyberpunk 2077, With a maximum RT pass (probably psycho) they operated only 34 FPS on the best processors, including Ryzen 7 9800x3D. Slower systems, such as Ryzen 5 5600 and Core i3-12100f, landed on 32 and 31 FPS respectively. Xeon E5-2680 V4 was again the lowest, but still with an average gender of 29 FPS. In other words, Ryzen 7 9800x3d surpassed XEON E5-2680 V4 by 17%. The minimum FPS was 19 on Xeon compared to up to 24 on the second processor, which is 26%.
Framegen DLSS3 and shifts increasing the raising of frames, with Xeon landing at 95 FPS compared to 125–132 FPS on other systems. In this case, it was up to 28% slower. But then DLSS 4 with generating many frames (MFG) increases even more.
Ryzen 7 9800x3D managed 255 FPS, with about 250 FPS on all other AMD systems except Ryzen 5 5600. DLSS 4 with MFG4X on Xeon E5-2680 V4 allowed an age-old processor to match other Intel FPS systems. He won 213 FPS, compared to 219–226 FPS on the second Intel processor. This is only a 6% difference … unless you look at the minimum FPS. In this case, Xeon managed only 78 FPS (basically 12100F binding), while most other processors were in the range of 120–150 FPS.
In low, no, the nine -year -old Xeon processor does not keep up with the latest systems, with or without Framegen and MFG and height. But he is doing better than you can expect, at least in three games that have been tested on RTX 5090D. Generating frames can be particularly helpful in games that are completely narrow processor, because this means that GPU has a lot of space to conduct AI procedures to generate frames. This is particularly helpful in Xeon E5-2680 V4, because it will be seriously narrow by the processor.
This does not mean, however, that MFG and Framegen are a solution for the CPU bottleneck. If you take some of the minimum FPS results and divide by four (as in Cyberpunk 2077), the basic monastery was below 20 fps. It can be playable, technically after four times up to 78 FPS, but this is not the most uninteresting experience at all.
