Was any type of graphics card as dramatically stored as GeForce XX80? RTX 3080 was a beauty, but to be destroyed by the worst madness (and limiting cryptocurrency mining) in the history of PC components. Then RTX 4080 shook the ridiculous price of 1269 GBP / 1199 USD, which is so earnest that RTX 4080 looked great – although it is almost not faster – just because it will not repeat it. Due to the novel RTX 5080. to want It’s uninteresting.
It is not. But it is also not an Albobeler, such as RTX 4080, or largely aspiration show-offs, such as RTX 5090. By maintaining a correction of the 4080 great course, at the same time tools at the convincing improvement of DLSS 4, RTX 5080 is a pleasant graphic processor with The Off . In particular, if you have a 4K monitor to fully utilize it.
It is certainly a more reasonable purchase than RTX 5090 for Game Games. The edition of the founders, like the one I test here, will restore you 979 £ / 999 USD, i.e. about half the price of the next (and final) RTX 50 model at the stake. Plus, although it has the same 16 GB of 256-bit VRAM as 4080 and 4080 Super, still enough for all the largest varieties of resources in the AAA industry, and has been improved to GDDR7 for additional capacity. Get the edition of the founders and you will also pack the same lovely metal design and an effective double refrigeration, which RTX 5090 Fe has, acting even cooler thanks to the needs of lower RTX 4080 power.
This is still thirsty for the creation to be sure: Nvidia thinks you will need at least 850 PSU to start it, and maximum utilize is assessed at 360 W. However, unlike RTX 5090 Fe, I did not record RTX 5080 fe actual Achievements of the limit, and when starting games reached the 322W peak. The high GPU temperature of 64 ° C was also 9 degrees good, also 5090. See? Reasonable. ISH.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Review: 4K Temparks
RTX 5080 does not tell the largest and most terrible monitoring resolution, even in newer arduous runners. RTX 5090 is still faster, although RTX 5080 is always able to adapt to the expansive majority of frames in the frame per second for a semiconductor production of half of cash. It is also a juicy improvement compared to the elite RTX 30 series – encouraging, if you update from an older card – and even approaches RTX 4090, which at the time of writing is still 1300 pounds in the amount of 1300 pounds on the used market.
Keen Bar Fan Fan can remember that RTX 4080 has overcome RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 TI, so it’s a bit back for RTX 5080 so as not to overtake the best dog of the previous generation. I am not sure if this is a particularly huge matter, except for maintaining the convention, although I would like the RTX 5080 to not give more speed to rasterized, native games in RTX 4080 great.
To look at it, we must-time, but with an apology-turn to the senior RPS test set and its basic i5-11600k, which is the only one for which I have great RTX 4080 results. Cyberpunk 2077 sees a decent tumor, rising from 51 frames on A second (with ultra settings) for Super 4080 to 71 frames per second to 5080, although the latest 81 FPS GPU in F1 22 (on Ultra High) is an augment in only 12 frames per second. Metro Exodus also barely improved, on average 99 frames per second to 4080 super and 106 frames per second to 5080.
However, there is no RTX 40 series cards, it is not a full package of DLSS 4 cage tools tools – Is Available for older RTX models, the main multi -lane generation (MFG) is only for the RTX 50 series. And it can actually poke RTX 5080 for RTX 4090, at least in terms of purely perceptible smoothness.
If you are unknown, the MFG accepts the generation of AI DLSS 3 frames and can vomit anywhere from one to three generated frames for each frame that the computer actually renders. This adds an additional input delay and not necessarily feel Smooth (because the generated frames do not include mouse movements or keyboard pressure), but the visual effect may look very good. In RTX 5080 MFG also opens the possibility of over 60 frames per second, while connecting 4K with the most demanding effects of tracking rays and tracking paths in the industry. In all three games I have tried, the utilize of 4x Frame Gen allow her saunter for RTX 4090, whose DLSS 3 version is maximally with the appropriate 2x mfg setting.
Apart from Benchmark, the neurosis looks and seems to be playable, although Alan Wake II began to push 100 ms delay with 4x mfg – it is enough to strive to become a bit snail-paced. I would probably drop DLSS growth from a sustainable quality, in such a case to raise a base of 37 RAM other than AI per second. This would improve even more visual smoothness, while touching reactivity. Otherwise, DLSS 4 presents a convincing argument in favor of RTX 5080 IA 75 compatible confirmed gamesIt becomes a much more supported beginning of life than the competing Frame Gen technology, such as FSR 3 and Xess 2.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Review: 1440p benchmarks
As always, anything 4K can do, 1440p can do faster, and there are good reasons to choose RTX 5080 for this resolution, if you redirected the entire budget of the monitor update to the GPU fund. The bottleneck of the processor summarizes the high POPPPIA RTX 5090, enabling this cheaper card to keep the pace more effective, at the same time narrowing the gap against RTX 4090 and even the style on RTX 3090.
After saying, at this stage it is worth waiting for RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 TI. The RTX 5080 is undoubtedly a firm storm on 1440p, but unlike 4K, sometimes there is a feeling that you pay for more power and function than you can utilize. For example, 4x MFG is not so useful, because the frames that you can get without it are already high: Take Cyberpunk 2077 with Psycho Ray Training, which RTX 5080 can work from 106 frames per second with a withdrawal of DLSS at high quality level. Most monitors would not even be able to display all additional AI frames, even if your eyes could see the difference between such speeds – and decreasing turns.
On the other hand, in some games there is a case of 2x Gen. F1 24 on Ultra High Rose from 116 frames per second from only high quality DLSS to 148 frames per second with a framework gene, and this actually caused a noticeable (if compact) improvement in smoothness. RTX 5080 is apparently not a bad graphic processor for Quad HD – this is simply not the best resolution for distributing the wings of DLSS 4, so it will be intriguing to check whether the Duo RTX 5070 is more accessible to get more suitable matches.
Or maybe AMD Radeon RX 9070. It will have its own DLSS rival in FSR 4, although it seems that it will be a simpler 2x frame generator in DLSS 3 veins. Thanks to faster and more versatile MFG, the option of DLSS 4 and historical transformer model. The advantages of the GeForce line with Ray and the path, it is arduous to see how RDNA 4 GPUs will be able to stand in relation to RTX 50 series series on functions.
In any case, for 4K RTX 5080 he is the one he defeated. It is cooler, more proficient and (no, counting all potential inventory deficiencies) drastically more available than RTX 5090, and at the same time has enough muscles for skillful, maximum performance. Is it as nice as the penniless, armed with the RTX 3080 seller? Not so much – a larger jump from RTX 4080 would be a great appreciation. But in general it is a better offer than great and original RTX 4080, especially after using more advanced technology. Tech, which can assist him leave RTX 4090 behind him, let alone these 4080.
This review is based on a retail unit provided by the manufacturer.
