Newgg has 13 RTX 5050 models ready to release Baby Blackwell, but no one should pay for one $ 250 in their right mind, not to mention $ 290 for miserable strain

The exact release date of the recent NVIDIA RTX 5050 5050 graphics card is not crystal clear, but one US main retailer already mentions 13 different models, with most of them is 250 USD one cent. However, the most costly is USD 290 – only USD 10 less than the cheapest RTX 5060 RTX.

The announcement of NVIDIA for the GeForce RTX 5050 computer graphics card surprised us all, partly because the media usually get an embargo about such things (which, according to my best knowledge, none of us did) and partly because the RTX 5060 was the lowest level of Blackwell GPU.

As our editor -in -chief of equipment Dave James stated during the RTX 5060 live review, it is a bit faster than his predecessor, RTX 4060, and they are simple to find in a warehouse at 300 USD MSRP. Well, not because there are many models at this price (Newgg has only two), but that’s all you have to spend on such a graphics card.

In any case, to the side, it is a sensible graphic processor at the basic level-to VRAM is a quick GDDR7 and you have a full DLSS 4 package with an exaggerated result, generating many frames and RAY reconstruction. But Nvidia clearly decided that it was not basic enough, hence $ 50 cheaper RTX 5050.

In addition to ASUS, “Prime RTX 5050, exchanged on USD 290 for Nevenggawhich is only $ 10 cheaper; All my life I don’t see who will really buy this card. I will explain why, using the table below, which summarizes the relevant specifications for USD 290 RTX 5050 and the cheapest RTX 5060 in Newgg:

This $ 300 $ RTX 5060 is 39% faster in terms of shading, texturing and reading pixels than writing than $ 290 $ RTX 5050. It also has 40% more VRAM capacity, although it uses about 15 in more power, but it’s nothing. And all this for only 10 additional dollars.

I am not saying that it is mean to Asus or Newgga, but I honestly hope that none of these main RTX 5050 cards is sold. No one should even look at one thing to think about one, and if you have a friend or family member who can be on the fence to go to such a fancy graphics card, and then immediately go away.

Sure, it is a modeling model and has three fans instead of ordinary two, but if they absolutely have to have a new NVIDIA RTX 50-SERIES card and cannot spend more than USD 290, just give them $ 10 so that they can have RTX 5060.

But what if they have only USD 250? Should they consider the cheapest RTX 5050? Heaven above, NO. Discover USD 10 that you have and direct them to Intel ARC B570 for $ 260 in Amazon. His drivers are sometimes a bit of Wonky-Donkey, and the upscalerist generator and Intel frames are not so good or widely served, but besides, it is a perfectly good GPU.

And although we have not yet tested the RTX 5050, it apparently will not be as fast as RTX 5060 or Arc B570 in games.

If Nvidia launches RTX 5050 with MSRP 200 USD, I would recommend one in the blink of an eye, but I suspect that no supplier of an additional board would be satisfied with this price, because he would not have any profit margin. An alternative would be a better GPU on the card, which was only 20 to 25% fell on RTX 5060, but Nvidia would have difficulty justifying the additional costs of 5060.

Ultimately, RTX 5050 should really remain in the same sector as the last generation siblings. RTX 4050 was fine for supplying basic games laptops and I should know because I have been using one for almost a year to test all the latest and best games. Stick to 1080p and medium settings, and it will lead most of the games with pleasant performance; Call summary, and in some cases a bit of frame generation and this is surprisingly good-for the basic general doctor.

It will be the same for RTX 5050. But as a basic graphics card? God no, absolutely not.

The best PC Build 2025 computer